Written by Salary.com Staff
April 30, 2024
It is no secret that compensation is one of the biggest expenses for any company. And let us be honest: who does not want to earn more? As companies grow and evolve, it can be tricky to keep compensation budgets and plans in check. This article takes an honest look at some of the key signs that your compensation management may be spiraling out of control.
Through real-world examples and expert insights, learn how to spot red flags and course correct when needed. It all comes down to balance —paying employees fairly without breaking the bank. Read on to find out if your compensation strategy needs a tune-up.
Compensation management gone awry often starts small before spiraling out of control. If a company shows multiple of these warning signs, it is time for an overhaul to get compensation back on track.
Do employees understand how the company makes pay decisions? If not, distrust and dislike may build, damaging the company culture. Transparency is key.
Do people with similar roles, tenure and performance receive vastly different amounts? If so, the compensation system lacks fairness and objectivity. This inconsistency impacts productivity and retention.
Are salaries increased only when employees threaten to quit? This reactive approach means a flawed system. To avoid constant renegotiation, companies must link pay directly to business goals and performance.
Do the best employees often leave for higher pay elsewhere? This high turnover rate drains the company of business knowledge and future leaders. Competitive, performance-based pay helps attract and keep top talent.
With some work, companies can overhaul their compensation management and correct these issues. Start by clearly linking pay to performance and business goals. Conduct regular pay reviews to check for fairness and consistency. Increase transparency so employees know the rationale behind pay levels. With the right fixes, companies will gain control of compensation and reap the rewards of a motivated, loyal workforce.
To rein in an out-of-control compensation management system, companies need to act.
Analyze current pay levels and structures to reveal if there are any inequities or improper payments. Look for unfair variances in pay for similar roles. This helps create a baseline to build a fair system.
Inconsistent job titles and vague role definitions add to compensation confusion. Develop clear job descriptions that specify key duties and requirements for each position. This makes it easier to assess jobs and set appropriate pay levels.
A well-designed pay structure provides a systematic way to set pay for positions. It establishes logical pay progressions and clear parameters for increases. Pay structures must reflect the company’s pay philosophy and link pay to job needs.
Educate managers on how to properly assess jobs, place positions in the pay structure, and determine fair pay. They need to understand the pay philosophy and policies to make good pay decisions. Provide ongoing guidance to help managers improve their compensation management skills.
Monitor the compensation program to make sure it remains equitable and continues to meet the company’s needs. Review job descriptions and re-evaluate positions to see if there are any necessary changes or adjustments to the pay structure. Analyze pay levels to spot any new issues. Adjust as needed to keep compensation management under control.
With these steps, companies can develop a fair and well-managed compensation system that provides proper pay for positions and keeps costs under control. Staying on top of compensation management is key to long-term success.
Compensation management can be complicated, leading to many questions from employees and managers alike. Here are a few common FAQs:
Most experts recommend reviewing compensation at least annually to know if there is a need for any adjustments based on changes in job duties, cost of living, or market rates. The key is to review often enough to ensure pay remains fair and competitive.
The short answer is both. Base pay must be based on the job position, level of responsibility, and required experience. Performance-based pay must depend heavily on an individual's contributions and performance. The right compensation plan incorporates both position- and performance-based pay.
Transparency promotes fairness and trust in the compensation system. But confidentiality may make some employees uncomfortable and risk compensation envy or bitterness. Many companies take a middle ground, sharing general pay philosophies and ranges but keeping individual salaries private. This balanced approach aims to build trust while respecting privacy.
In summary, compensation management is an ongoing process that requires regular review and adjustment to be fair, competitive, and aligned with company values. With open communication and the right policies in place, companies can manage compensation effectively.
In the world of compensation management, it is easy to lose control. But a few key signals can tip you off when things start sliding. Keep an eye out for runaway budgets, unclear goals, and frustrated employees. Getting back on track takes work but it is doable. Start with a compensation philosophy to guide decisions. Analyze your pay structure and job architecture for problem spots. And do not forget communication— talk to managers and employees so everyone is on the same page.
With some dedicated effort, you can wrangle compensation and make it work for your company again. The task requires attention, but it is worth it for productive, satisfied staff and a sustainable bottom line.
Download our white paper to further understand how organizations across the country are using market data, internal analytics, and strategic communication to establish an equitable pay structure.